Vaccines for COVID-19: Do, Don’t Defer?

covid vaccine

Citizens for Health supports the right of every individual to choose to take or to not take any vaccine, including the right to conscientious objection, as a part of any properly adopted legal vaccine mandate. We are bringing to you the following two views on the value of receiving one of the approved COVID-19 vaccines so that you may make an informed decision about how best to maintain health and wellness for you and your family.

We are all struggling to some degree with the impact of the pandemic on our work, our leisure, and our ability to engage with friends and loved ones. Many people are heartened by the advances made in developing vaccines to prevent the virus and its variants, but the speed with which manufacturers have presented vaccines has concerned many other people about whether those vaccines were researched and vetted sufficiently. The result: Families everywhere are confronting difficult decisions about whether to vaccinate, and when.

vaccines oppositionFirstly, at the request of allies supporting Stop Medical Discrimination & Americas Front Line Doctors, we share this petition opposing efforts to convince the public to accept experimental vaccines. Please note that SMD & AFLD assert that their effort, and we quote them exactly, “is NOT ‘anti-vaxx’ or in any other form to be considered or mislabeled as disapproving of established, reputable vaccines when taken voluntarily without coercion.”

 

 

vaccines supportMeanwhile, the folks at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assert “While more COVID-19 vaccines are being developed as quickly as possible, routine processes and procedures remain in place to ensure the safety of any vaccine that is authorized or approved for use. Safety is a top priority, and there are many reasons to get vaccinated.” For more information in support of accepting one of the approved COVID-19 vaccines, visit this page from the CDC.

Related Posts

Comments (1)

HEALTH CARE WORKERS/ADMINISTRATORS OF COVID VACCINE HAVE ZERO IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY WITHOUT FIRST SECURING INFORMED CONSENT

According to 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”

However, this immunity does not apply to health care workers, pharmacy employees, grocery store and discount store workers [like Wal-Mart] because they are not employees of the vaccine manufacturers.

In other words, immunity protection is not extended to anyone who is not working for Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, or Moderna.

The health care workers, pharmacy workers, grocery workers, and mass distribution workers [Wal-Mart] [collectively referred to herein as “vaccine inoculators”] are liable if they failed to obtain Proof of Informed Consent by each and every person that has been vaccinated/inoculated.

The lack of Informed Consent exists when the recipient of the vaccine has not been informed of the risks to health and life and has not consented to receiving the vaccine despite being told of said risks.

In the case of the COVID Vaccine, the risks that would have had to be communicated to the person prior to being given the vaccine are:

1. Known injury and deaths from Messenger RNA prions, which in the case of cattle, results in “Mad Cow Disease,” and in the case of human beings, results in the manifestation of brain dysfunction and hysteria;

2. Known injury and death from anaphylactic shock resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine;

3. Known injury and death from toxic lung, heart, and brain paralysis resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine;

4. Known injury and death from toxic blood clotting resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine; and:

5. Known injury and death from toxemia arising from infertility complications resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine.

The Informed Consent must contain a signed acknowledgment by the person before vaccination occurs, agreeing to being vaccinated in spite of the risks presented by the vaccine inoculator (administering the vaccine).

The lack of Informed Consent is a violation of the HIPAA Act, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1966, Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 45 C.F.R. Part 160, Subparts C, D, and E.

If a person administering the vaccine fails to obtain a Signed Informed Consent at the time of inoculation, he or she has no immunity and can be sued for various crimes and torts, including deliberate indifference and willful negligence, and attempted murder.

The vaccine inoculator has liability, and can lose all of his/her assets, including one’s home, automobiles, investment holdings, and personal property.

It is my humble opinion that once said liability is made known by and through the filing of the first in a series of class action lawsuits, vaccine inoculators will think twice before administering any further vaccines.

While the vaccine manufacturers have immunity, the vaccine inoculators may easily seek remunerative compensation indemnification/relief by further suing their own employers [hospitals, pharmacies, etc.] which will ultimately create an upward chain of liability that is not covered by vaccine manufacturers’ immunity.

I suggest that we contact the most media-recognizable spokespersons against the Vaccine Holocaust, including Mike Adams from the Health Ranger; Pastor David Sorensen from “Stop World Control,” and of course, Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or suggestions.

Steven Fishman
Stevenfishman7781@gmail.com
(949) 382-4254

Leave a comment

65 + = 66